| |
Managing Business Performance through
Governance, Risk and Compliance |
 |
|
|
| |
|
|
Risk Governance Limited
Surrey House
34 Eden Street
Kingston, Surrey KT1 1ER
|
Telephone:
+44 (0) 20 8481 3883
Contact: John Conaghan
john.conaghan@riskgovernance.com
|
Introduction
The mere mention of Governance, Risk and Compliance (GRC) is likely
to glaze the eyes of many a senior executive in todays corporate
world for others it will serve as a timely prompt to send
their lawyer a birthday card. Although the importance of GRC is
well recognised, it is usually thought of as an unwelcome cost to
the business and something that often gets in the way of delivering
the results. Sadly, in many cases it does, but this neednt
be so. Indeed, we argue that the appropriate attention to Governance,
Risk and Compliance is essential to maximise business performance
results. Its been said before but
GOOD RISK MANAGEMENT = GOOD MANAGEMENT
As sure as death and taxes, GRC is now an item
that has to be taken very seriously. Whether it is Sarbanes-Oxley,
the Combined Code in the UK, HIPAA, Basel II, industry-specific
regulators, or simply shareholder pressure, companies and their
officers need to turn these elements into strategic and economic
value.
No-one is advocating eliminating risk altogether.
That would be akin to throwing the baby out with the bath water.
After all, risk creates opportunity; opportunity creates value and
wealth. Responsible management of risk is key to unlocking business
value and creating wealth for shareholders.
The important thing is to turn GRC into a value-generation
activity. The potential for this is tremendous and absolutely dwarves
the benefits that can be derived from other management techniques
such as balanced scorecard and management by objectives.
Most popular performance management techniques
are backwards looking. In other words, they compare historic results
against targets and objectives. Although this is a commendable thing
to do, because you can learn from mistakes and continuously improve
your business performance, isnt it better to focus attention
on activities that will positively influence
the results?
Business performance is eroded by a series of
events that contrive to diminish your corporate effectiveness: your
top sales team is recruited by your competitor; your new product
line is six months late; theres a sustained hike in global
energy pricing; your core market is disrupted by a new technology
appearance. All of these events are material threats to your business.
In todays world, every corporate officer has a duty to consider
all material threats to their business and put in place controls
and actions to mitigate those risks; and to ensure that there is
an embedded, sustainable process for identifying, assessing and
managing risk. This is what good Enterprise Risk Management is all
about.
One of the difficult challenges is to introduce
the right sort of culture, the right sort of systems and processes
to make sure that your GRC efforts do
not get in the way of delivering the results.
Simply loading additional reporting bureaucracy on already busy
people will have the opposite effect to the desired one. Finding
a way to gain enthusiastic and painless participation in the process
is the key to unlocking the benefits and value that are there to
be realised.
Executed properly, an embedded GRC process
will give early warnings of risks and will minimise the impact of
any that materialise keeping business performance levels
high.
Steps towards value from GRC
GRC spend has rocketed in recent years; fuelled
by events and corporate disasters such as 9/11, Enron and a whole
catalogue of others. Sarbanes-Oxley, Basel II, The Combined Code
etc
have created a consulting industry feeding-frenzy not seen since
the days of Y2k. The leading companies in the US are spending a
minimum of $3m to address their Sarbox initial filing requirements
with many spending as much as $10m.
This level of spending on consulting fees is not
sustainable. Companies must seek to embed the right sort of culture,
systems and processes to ensure that governance and risk management
are part of the fabric of the organisation. In other words, take
the output from the consulting phase of work and encapsulate it
within a flexible system that will introduce a standard vocabulary
and method for identifying and managing risk within a performance
management framework.
In broad terms, there are a number of steps
that an organisation must take to ensure that they are getting business
value out of their GRC efforts. They include:
- Ensuring that theres a coherent set of
business objectives that permeate throughout the business;
- Ensuring that all material assets, physical
or non-physical are identified and their value is understood;
- With objectives and assets as the focal point,
identify material threats and vulnerabilities (i.e. risks) that
could interfere with your ability to protect those assets or meet
those objectives;
- Involve risk owners (as well as risk experts)
in the process by approaching the subject from their perspective
in other words from a business objectives perspective;
- Adopt a light touch to the risk
assessment piece. Serious risks can be isolated for more detailed
analysis, but unless theyre identified properly in the first
place, you wont even know that many of them exist;
- Seek to embed a risk-aware culture throughout
the organisation. Provide accessible help through on-line knowledge
and policy information in order to raise the average level of
risk-competence;
- Over time, develop localised Loss Expectancy
information that will inform future predictions and continuously
improve the accuracy of reporting;
- Manage compliance issues in the same way as
other risks. Compliance breaches after all represent a risk to
the business;
- Ensure that there are clear and unambiguous
lines of responsibility and communication around objectives, risks,
controls, compliance and governance issues;
- Set thresholds for early warnings and for escalation
of issues up the management hierarchy;
- Avoid deluging people with information. Seek
out the key reporting items and present them intuitively and graphically
a picture tells a thousand words.
Realisable Benefits from GRC
The list of benefits below relates to benefits
that can be realised from the introduction of sound governance and
risk management processes and is drawn from a list compiled by the
Institute of Chartered Accountants of England & Wales (ICAEW).
These have been echoed by almost every professional body since the
late 1990s. They include:
- greater likelihood of achieving objectives;
- higher share price over the long-term;
- greater likelihood of successful change initiatives;
- lower cost of capital;
- early mover into new business areas;
- reduced insurance premiums;
- reduction in cost of remedial work and firefighting;
- achievement of competitive advantage;
- less business interruption;
- achievement of compliance/regulatory targets.
These benefits go to the very heart of business
performance. Can you imagine the impact it would have on your business
if even only two or three of these benefits were realised?
Earlier we listed the steps necessary to
gain value from your GRC efforts. Some of these steps are discussed
in more detail in a White Paper titled Managing Business Performance
through Governance Risk and Compliance and we draw upon considerable
experience in the design and deployment of GRC solutions for Global
1000 companies in outlining these steps. If you would like to have
a copy of the White Paper please email me at john.conaghan@riskgovernance.com
| Example screens
from a leading GRC application |
 |
 |
back
to top
|